Utilities manage massive initiatives, including transmission upgrades, broadband deployments, storm-hardening programs and distributed energy resource (DER) interconnection projects. These initiatives are often executed on tight deadlines, span multiple regions, involve diverse stakeholders, encompass challenging regulatory hurdles and demand precise coordination.
Traditional project management methods are effective for single project efforts, but when dozens of projects are worked on simultaneously, complexity and issues can escalate. That is where a program management office (PgMO) comes in, providing structure, scalability and predictability across a utility’s entire program or capital spend portfolio.
Project vs. Program Management
Project managers and program managers in construction differ in their scopes and focus. Project managers handle individual projects, including planning, scheduling, budgeting and execution, using tools such as Microsoft Project or Oracle Primavera. Program managers, on the other hand, oversee multiple projects strategically through resource allocation, long-term planning and process standardization. Tools such as Smartsheet or Power BI support this work by helping maintain alignment with organizational goals.
Both project managers and program managers are critical, but they operate at different levels.
Project management involves individual project execution, risk management, stakeholder communication and quality control, while program management coordinates multiple related projects under a single strategy, with overlapping scopes, shared assets and regulatory requirements handled consistently.
This distinction matters because large-scale initiatives, such as DERs and renewables projects, aren’t single projects but interconnected waves of work that require special attention. Today’s energy projects have more players and more process touchpoints, raising the stakes for consistent, high-quality delivery.
Why PgMOs Matter
To meet energy and climate goals, global grid investments must increase from $300 billion to $600 billion annually by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Many of these efforts will be large-scale utility initiatives and managing them with only project-level tools could lead to bottlenecks, duplicated work and missed opportunities.
Each infrastructure project comes with unique technical requirements, permitting steps and timelines. When these projects converge at the same substation or in the same region, scopes could collide, departments could drift out of sync and rework could become a real threat. Given this, PgMOs deliver practical advantages for utilities:
DER Growth: The Ideal Case for PgMOs
Energy projects, including large renewables projects and DERs, involve a wide range of stakeholders at the national, state, utility, developer and end-customer levels. DERs are transforming the grid by increasing flexibility, supporting decarbonization and helping meet rising demand. DER adoption — including everything from rooftop solar installations and community solar farms to battery storage systems, microgrids and electrical vehicle charging infrastructure — has surged due to market incentives and evolving policies.
In 2024, installed energy infrastructure capacity rose by nearly 30%, marking the largest single year expansion since 2002, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Combined, the EIA reports, solar power and battery storage account for about 81% of the capacity additions.
Legacy processes can’t handle the scale of today’s energy projects. With rising DER adoption and massive renewables projects, utilities need updated delivery solutions to keep up. PgMOs bring structure to potential chaos by creating scalable processes that adapt as conditions change, aligning schedules and standardizing practices across all related work.
The Future of PgMOs
A few takeaways about PgMOs stand out. First, project managers can do more than track schedules and budgets. In a program management setting, they can shape processes that boost efficiency, reduce cost and strengthen collaboration across the board. Second, coordination among project managers can help avoid colliding scopes, which protects near-term milestones and long-term cost efficiency. Third, consistent estimating and knowledge-sharing minimizes rework and helps teams move faster with fewer surprises. Gains delivered by using PgMOs include:
And what comes next in program management is already taking shape.
Program management is evolving from process improvement to leveraging predictive, data-driven insights from project and program data to identify risks early and prevent issues before they can occur. That evolution is a natural extension of the work PgMOs execute and track, keeping project teams’ focus where it belongs: on delivering reliable, safe outcomes for customers and communities as the grid changes.