Burns & McDonnell
burnsmcd.com
May 14, 2026 Power

Implementation and the Operational Realities of Grid Modernization

The push to modernize the nation’s power grid has created a complex marketplace. Faced with the limitations of aging infrastructure and the promise of a smarter grid, many utilities are navigating a landscape in which technology providers are increasingly specializing in their core competencies. Such a landscape presents an opportunity for utilities to build a comprehensive partnership strategy, one that addresses the full scope of a modernization project, from initial concept to long-term operational success.

The shift toward specialization is a natural progression. While the software development process is a tried and true, repeatable solution, implementation must consider the nuances specific to each utility’s systems, grid architecture and operational processes, and therefore must be performed by teams that understand those real-world considerations. It brings to light the distinct roles of a software developer versus a strategic implementation partner. A vendor’s experience lies with its software, and its focus is on data and system performance. An implementation partner’s focus is on the real-world application of that system within a utility’s unique operational environment. Recognizing this distinction is crucial, as a modernization program is much more than a single project. The software is just one piece of the solution; it must work in a way that complements the existing business and, ultimately, elevates it.

A single decision made in an implementation silo can trigger a cascade of unforeseen business consequences. This can lead to a scenario in which a new system, while functioning exactly as designed, conflicts with established business processes. Thereby creating an operational disconnect as the technology and the team’s workflow are not fully aligned, requiring unforeseen adjustments and creating inefficiencies.

Read More

  • Power (503)
  • Environmental (318)
  • Construction (291)
  • Oil, Gas & Chemicals (229)
  • Manufacturing & Industrial (201)
  • Water (196)
  • Transportation (139)
  • Government & Military (126)
  • Commercial, Retail & Institutional (105)
  • Telecommunications (95)
  • Aviation (94)
  • Engineering (86)
  • Operations & Maintenance (62)
  • Commissioning (37)
  • Strategic Partners (37)
  • Mining & Minerals (24)
  • Program Management (24)
  • Architecture (15)
  • STEM (11)
  • Ownership (3)
  • Vlog (3)

Month

  • May 2026 (3)
  • April 2026 (6)
  • March 2026 (6)
  • February 2026 (5)
  • January 2026 (5)
  • December 2025 (5)
  • November 2025 (4)
  • October 2025 (6)
  • September 2025 (3)
  • August 2025 (6)
  • July 2025 (9)
  • June 2025 (8)
Post Image
Environmental
Oil Spill Control on Construction Sites Requires Ongoing Efforts
by Amy Reed
Post Image
Environmental
Proposed Hazardous Substance Regulation Could Pose Major Impact to Facilities
by Amy Reed
Post Image
Environmental
A Guide to Prepping for FRP Virtual Compliance Monitoring by EPA
by Amy Reed
Post Image
Environmental
Overcoming Five Common Facility Response Plan Deficiencies
by Amy Reed
Post Image
Environmental
Preparing for an Unannounced Facility Response Plan Exercise
by Amy Reed
Post Image
Environmental
This Is Not a Drill: Perfecting Spill Response Strategies
by Amy Reed
Post Image
Construction
SPCC Plans Can Avoid Liabilities, Schedule Risks on Construction Sites
by Amy Reed
Post Image
Environmental
Your Tank Integrity Program Might Need an Update
by Amy Reed
Previous Page Page 1 of 1 Next Page

Subscribe to your source for timely news, happenings and perspective on issues across the AEC landscape.

Contact