Burns & McDonnell
burnsmcd.com
May 14, 2026 Power

Implementation and the Operational Realities of Grid Modernization

The push to modernize the nation’s power grid has created a complex marketplace. Faced with the limitations of aging infrastructure and the promise of a smarter grid, many utilities are navigating a landscape in which technology providers are increasingly specializing in their core competencies. Such a landscape presents an opportunity for utilities to build a comprehensive partnership strategy, one that addresses the full scope of a modernization project, from initial concept to long-term operational success.

The shift toward specialization is a natural progression. While the software development process is a tried and true, repeatable solution, implementation must consider the nuances specific to each utility’s systems, grid architecture and operational processes, and therefore must be performed by teams that understand those real-world considerations. It brings to light the distinct roles of a software developer versus a strategic implementation partner. A vendor’s experience lies with its software, and its focus is on data and system performance. An implementation partner’s focus is on the real-world application of that system within a utility’s unique operational environment. Recognizing this distinction is crucial, as a modernization program is much more than a single project. The software is just one piece of the solution; it must work in a way that complements the existing business and, ultimately, elevates it.

A single decision made in an implementation silo can trigger a cascade of unforeseen business consequences. This can lead to a scenario in which a new system, while functioning exactly as designed, conflicts with established business processes. Thereby creating an operational disconnect as the technology and the team’s workflow are not fully aligned, requiring unforeseen adjustments and creating inefficiencies.

Read More

  • Power (503)
  • Environmental (318)
  • Construction (291)
  • Oil, Gas & Chemicals (229)
  • Manufacturing & Industrial (201)
  • Water (196)
  • Transportation (139)
  • Government & Military (126)
  • Commercial, Retail & Institutional (105)
  • Telecommunications (95)
  • Aviation (94)
  • Engineering (86)
  • Operations & Maintenance (62)
  • Commissioning (37)
  • Strategic Partners (37)
  • Mining & Minerals (24)
  • Program Management (24)
  • Architecture (15)
  • STEM (11)
  • Ownership (3)
  • Vlog (3)

Month

  • May 2026 (3)
  • April 2026 (6)
  • March 2026 (6)
  • February 2026 (5)
  • January 2026 (5)
  • December 2025 (5)
  • November 2025 (4)
  • October 2025 (6)
  • September 2025 (3)
  • August 2025 (6)
  • July 2025 (9)
  • June 2025 (8)
Post Image
Oil, Gas & Chemicals
Moving From Data Chaos to Project Clarity, Predictability and Collaboration
by Michelle Tuason
Post Image
Oil, Gas & Chemicals
HON Compliance Is More Than a Flare Upgrade for Chemical Plants
by Chris Ploetz
Post Image
Water
Severe Drought Conditions Driving Urgent Resiliency Strategies for Refineries Along Texas Gulf Coast
by Larry Close
Post Image
Oil, Gas & Chemicals
Q&A: Understanding the New HON Rule and Its Compliance Implications
by The Burns & McDonnell Team
Post Image
Power
Successful Gas Pipeline Expansion Requires Flexible Project Execution Delivery
by Dana Book
Post Image
Construction
Q&A: Safety, Teamwork and Leadership in the Field With Superintendent Devin Clay
by The Burns & McDonnell Team
Post Image
Oil, Gas & Chemicals
Polyethylene Demand Climbs but Market Uncertainty Slows Expansion
by Kevin Syphard
Post Image
Power
Natural Gas Should Be Leveraged to Rethink Energy Dependent Siting
by Michael D. Falk
Post Image
Oil, Gas & Chemicals
Changing Trade Dynamics Drive Demand for Feedstock Flexibility
by Jeff Bartels
Post Image
Environmental
Third-Party Environmental Audits Support Compliance Amid Regulatory Shifts
by Matt Shanahan

Subscribe to your source for timely news, happenings and perspective on issues across the AEC landscape.

Contact